HICKINGBOTTOM v. BUTTS et al
| MICHAEL DEWAYNE HICKINGBOTTOM |
| . BECKER, KEITH BUTTS, JOHN DOE, HIPPEL, HOBBS, JOHNSON, MILLER, MONZA, REECE, SHELTON and T. WOMACK |
| 1:2016cv01878 |
| July 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
Entry Discussing Complaint, Severing Misjoined Claims, and Directing Further Proceedings - This case is proceeding against Lieutenant Reece, Sergeant Hobbs, and Officers Shelton, Mozo, and Becker. The clerk shall terminate defendants Keith Butts , Dr. Hippel, Nurse Johnson, Nurse Womack, Ms. Miller, and John Doe Eye Doctor as defendants in this case.The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Lieutenant Reece, Sergeant Hobbs, and Officers Sh elton, Mozo, and Becker in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry.**SEE ORDER** Copy to Plaintiff and Defendants via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/19/2016.(JLS) Modified on 8/19/2016 (JLS).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
