Cases 1 - 10 of 100
RUSCELLA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02032
Plaintiff:
REECE RUSCELLA
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Capone et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2026cv07082
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Capone and Christopher Capone
Defendant:
Joshua Reece, Brian Moore and Arlees Raw Blends, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
HUGHES v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
REECE A. HUGHES
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grayson et al v. McGuffy
as 1:2026cv00895
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Grayson and Christy J. Grayson
Defendant:
Sheriff Charmaine McGuffy, NaphCare, Inc, Jennifer Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07485
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Adams, Janine Adelaja, Linda Alston and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Hukel v. RV S&E LLC dba CORVETTE BAR AND GRILL et al
as 1:2026cv01803
Plaintiff:
Don Hukel
Defendant:
RV S&E LLC dba CORVETTE BAR AND GRILL, Josephine County, Misty Strohmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pirtle v. Perry et al
as 2:2026cv00134
Plaintiff:
LeMark Pirtle
Defendant:
Rodney Perry, James Reeces and Mario Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Scott et al
as 3:2026cv00996
Plaintiff:
Tennille L. Reece
Defendant:
OFC. Tim Scott, K-9 OFC Brown, K-9 OFC Citron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Arizona Dream Team LLC et al
as 2:2026cv04900
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Reece
Defendant:
Arizona Dream Team LLC, Pamela Govan and Marvin McCullough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
