NEWTON v. FIFTH THIRD BANK
| NEWTON and JOHN NEWTON |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and FIFTH THIRD BANK |
| 1:2016cv02246 |
| August 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT FIFTH THIRD BANK - Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Fifth Third Bank is dismissed, with prejudice, each party tobear its own costs and fees, and this matter is now closed in its entirety. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/3/2017.(JRB)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Fifth Third Bank, filed by Plaintiff JOHN NEWTON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohron, Travis) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by May 3, 2017, why his claims against Defendant Fifth Third Bank should not be dismissed without prejudice and this action closed. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/19/2017.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC - Plaintiff John R. Newton, by counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), has moved this court to dismiss Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax") from this cause. The Court, being duly informed and finding said #10 Motion made for good cause, now GRANTS said Motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC only are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/16/2016. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (GSO)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Equifax Information Services, Inc., filed by Plaintiff JOHN NEWTON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohron, Travis) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by JOHN NEWTON. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC waiver sent on 11/9/2016. (Cohron, Travis) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #7 Motion to File Under Seal. The Clerk is directed to maintain Docket Numbers 1-1 and 1-3 under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 10/11/2016. (SWM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, filed by Plaintiff JOHN NEWTON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cohron, Travis) Modified on 10/6/2016 (GSO). |
| Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (GSO) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, FIFTH THIRD BANK. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis W. Cohron on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN R NEWTON. (Cohron, Travis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Barker on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN R NEWTON. (Barker, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Trial Demand against All Defendants, filed by JOHN R NEWTON. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4022691)*** EXHIBIT 1 AND 3 SEALED PER ORDER DATED 10/11/2016 *** (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Schedule F, #2 Exhibit B-Discharge Order, #3 Exhibit C-Dispute Letter, #4 Exhibit D-Reinvestigation Report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Barker, Andrew) Modified on 10/6/2016 (GSO). Modified on 10/11/2016 (SWM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
