Cases 1 - 10 of 4,212
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, CHARLTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Karki et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anita Karki and Newton Prajapati
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05688
Plaintiff:
NEWTON KING and THE ESTATE OF CYNTHIA KING, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Andrew Cooperrider, et al v. Maggie Woods, et al
as 24-5351
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COOPERRIDER and DEANS DINER, LLC, dba Brewed
Defendant:
MAGGIE WOODS, Malt Beverage Administrator with the Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, in her individual and official capacity, ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Governor of Kentucky, in his individual and official capacity, RAY A. PERRY, Secretary of Public Protection Cabinet, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
