MONTGOMERY v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY and SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY
Defendant: INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2016cv03207
Filed: November 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Referring Judge: Larry J McKinney
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 b3
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2017 Filing 11 CLOSED DISMISSED - MARGINAL ENTRY. This matter dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 2/8/2017.(LDH)
February 7, 2017 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY. (Volheim, Nathan)
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Plaintiff Shandel Samuel Montgomery ("Montgomery") has notified the Court that the parties have reached a settlement #8 . The parties shall have to and including February 24, 2017, to file their stipulation of dismissal. All dates and deadlines, whether by Court order or as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, are hereby VACATED or SUSPENDED, until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 12/22/2016.(LDH)
December 21, 2016 Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement, filed by Plaintiff SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY (Volheim, Nathan)
December 21, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Baker, Christopher)
December 21, 2016 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher E. Baker on behalf of Defendant INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Baker, Christopher)
December 7, 2016 Filing 5 RETURN of Service, filed by SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC. served on 11/30/2016. (Volheim, Nathan)
November 28, 2016 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM)
November 28, 2016 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC. (AAM)
November 23, 2016 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Plaintiff SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY. (Volheim, Nathan)
November 23, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., filed by SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4140169) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Volheim, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONTGOMERY v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Represented By: Christopher E. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANDEL SAMUEL MONTGOMERY
Represented By: Nathan C. Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?