Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Montgomery et al
as 1:2026cv06037
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gigante and Kenneth Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09928
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01452
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra Zeraschi, Allison McGinnity, Debra Zellin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jean Germain v. Haekyoung Suh, et al
as 26-3844
Defendant:
Premier Management Associates, Piazza & Associates Inc, Mezzacca & Kwasnik LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Germain
Silver Spring Jewish Center v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 26-2623
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Plaintiff:
RABBI J. MENASHE SHAPIRO and SILVER SPRING JEWISH CENTER
DONNELLY v. HOLLIBAUGH et al.,
as 2:2026cv08653
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and HOLLIBAUGH
Petitioner:
PATRICK DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IAM National 401(k) Fund et al v. VOLVO OF GLEN COVE, LLC
as 1:2026cv03949
Defendant:
VOLVO OF GLEN COVE, LLC
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA MONTGOMERY and IAM National 401(k) Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09888
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
