Cases 1 - 10 of 1,556
Montgomery v. Seminole Hard Rock Digital, LLC
as 8:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Brandon Montgomery
Defendant:
Seminole Hard Rock Digital, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. Montgomery et al
as 6:2024cv00703
Defendant:
Joshua Montgomery and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
The United States of America v. Woodlands at Montgomery LP et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Woodlands at Montgomery LP, Woodlands at Montgomery GP LLC, Kittle Property Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
The Federal Savings Bank v. Stephon Montgomery, et al
as 24-11061
Plaintiff:
THE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Defendant:
STEPHON L. MONTGOMERY and HELEN IRBY
Craven Casper v. FPC Montgomery Warden, et al
as 24-10948
Petitioner:
CRAVEN CASPER
Respondent:
FPC MONTGOMERY WARDEN and CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
