WOOD v. MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC. et al
WOOD and WILLIAM R WOOD |
MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC, WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. and MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC. |
1:2016cv03217 |
November 28, 2016 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A Baker |
Denise K LaRue |
William T Lawrence |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 CLOSED DISMISSED. Approved Stipulation Of Dismissal - Plaintiff, by Counsel R. Daniel Craven, and Defendant, by Counsel Miriam A. Rich, hereby Stipulate and Agree to the Dismissal of the above-captioned pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(2), with prejudice. (Marginal Entry) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/5/2018.(JDC) |
Filing 29 STIPULATION of Dismissal , filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD. (Craven, Robert) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 25 First MOTION for Continuance of Pre-Trial Conference and Settlement Conference, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Craven, Robert) |
Filing 24 Exhibit List Preliminary, filed by Defendant MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC.. (Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 23 Witness List Preliminary, filed by Defendant MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC.. (Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 22 Exhibit List Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD. (Craven, Robert) |
Filing 21 Witness List Preliminary, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD. (Craven, Robert) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 17 ENTRY-marginal-Stipulation of dismissal as to WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. only without prejudice. The parties further stipulate that this defendant shall not be identified as a non-party pursuant to the Indiana Comparative Fault Act. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/27/2017.(CBU) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION Of Dismissal of Waffle House, Inc. Only, filed by Defendant WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.. (Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 15 TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge William T. Lawrence. (BRR) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 Amended CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD . (Craven, Robert) |
![]() |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD . (Craven, Robert) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Miriam A. Rich hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. Notice of Change of Firm and Address (Rich, Miriam) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Daniel Craven on behalf of Plaintiff WILLIAM R WOOD. (Craven, Robert) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by All Defendants.(Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC., WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.. (Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Miriam A. Rich on behalf of Defendants MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC., WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.. (Rich, Miriam) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Bartholomew Circuit, case number 03C01-1611-CT-005993, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-4141396) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court records re Midwest Waffles, Inc, #2 Exhibit B - A - State Court records re Waffle House, Inc, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - SoS report Midwest Waffles, Inc., #5 Exhibit E - SoS report Waffle House, Inc., #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rich, Miriam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.