Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wood v. King et al
as 1:2026cv00289
Plaintiff:
Arlington Austin Wood
Defendant:
S King, K. Smith, G Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Max Transit Center et al
as 2:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quinisha Lashon Woods
Defendant:
Max Transit Center and Birmingham Intermodal Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Manning v. Dub Brassell Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2026cv00681
Plaintiff:
Reco Manning
Defendant:
Dub Brassell Adult Detention Center, Lafayette Woods, Cadijah Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaver v. English et al
as 3:2026cv01019
Plaintiff:
Rodney Shaver, II
Defendant:
English, Shrek, Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Woods
as 4:2026cv00677
Plaintiff:
Charles White
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Carter v. Wood et al
as 3:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Keithfus Carter
Defendant:
Lenn Wood, Marcus Herrera, Jawad Akasheh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 26-4292
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. MITCHELL, JR.
Defendant:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, UNKNOWN HARRIS, Dismissed per ECF No. 10 Order, ROBERT HARTMAN and others
Carter v. United States of America et al
as 4:2026cv01899
Plaintiff:
Stanley Carter
Defendant:
United States of America, B. Wood, Maurice Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.