SNYDER v. ZATECKY et al
| ROBERT LEE SNYDER |
| ANDREW COLE, KRISTYN DICKINSON, JACKSON, ASHLEY MCCOY, CHARLES RINEHART, GERARD SPEARS, MIKE SPURGEON and DUSHAN ZATECKY |
| 1:2017cv03830 |
| October 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ENTRY Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court he shall have through December 28, 2017, in which to identify those c laims. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (c)(3) to issue process to defendants 1) Warden Zatecky, 2) Lt. Rinehart, and 3) Property Officer McCoy in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complain t filed on November 3, 2017, (docket 8), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk is designated to serve the Indiana Department of Correction employees electronically. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/6/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
