SMITH v. WOODARD
Plaintiff: CAMERON SMITH
Defendant: WOODARD
Case Number: 1:2018cv02290
Filed: July 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: William T Lawrence
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Retain Video Surveillance, filed by Plaintiff CAMERON SMITH. (REO)
July 26, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CAMERON SMITH. (REO)
July 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WOODARD, filed by CAMERON SMITH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. WOODARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAMERON SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WOODARD
Represented By: Adam Garth Forrest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?