Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Woodard v. USA
as 2:2026cv00160
Petitioner:
Rocky Woodard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marshall v. Sampson et al
as 3:2026cv02945
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
April Woodard Sampson, Judge Mattie Humphries and Tamkea Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Toole v. Woodard et al
as 2:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
Brett Woodard, General Norfolk Building Inspection and GMG Taylor and Ms. Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Leon v. Hughes et al
as 3:2026cv00973
Plaintiff:
Gaven Leon
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jeremiah L Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Feldman v. Sreit Ivy Louisville, LLC, et al
as 26-5633
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FELDMAN
Defendant:
SREIT IVY LOUISVILLE, LLC, dba The Ivy Apartment Homes, HIGHMARK RESIDENTIAL, LLC, ASHLEY LEMONS and others
Litex Industries Limited et al v. United States
as 1:2026cv03239
Plaintiff:
Litex Industries Limited, Craftmade International, Inc. and Woodard-CM, LLC
Defendant:
United States
Archie v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2026ct03202
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Archie
Defendant:
Rosmare Wyatt, Mr. Nunez, Nurse Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. ServiceMac, LLC
as 4:2026cv05429
Plaintiff:
Ericka Woodard
Defendant:
ServiceMac, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Fernandez v. City of Clarksville et al
as 1:2026cv01780
Plaintiff:
Texanna Fernandez
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Clarksville Police Department, Chief Ty Burdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Woodard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Christopher Woodard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
