SMITH v. KINISON et al
Plaintiff: LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant: HAMPTON, RAYMOND KINISON and STANLEY KNIGHT
Case Number: 1:2018cv03695
Filed: November 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LOWELL B. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Statement, #2 Envelope)(JDH)
January 7, 2019 Filing 6 ENTRY DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff shall have through February 5, 2019, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. If he seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, his request must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on November 26, 2018. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/7/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
December 19, 2018 Filing 5 ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT - The dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through January 18, 2019, in which to file an amended complaint (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/19/2018. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
December 10, 2018 Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by LOWELL B. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
December 10, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Injunctive Relief, filed by Plaintiff LOWELL B. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
November 27, 2018 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
November 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HAMPTON, RAYMOND KINISON, and STANLEY KNIGHT, filed by LOWELL B. SMITH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. KINISON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOWELL B. SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAMPTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAYMOND KINISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STANLEY KNIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?