Cases 1 - 10 of 13
UNDERHILL v. RIPPETOE et al
as 1:2020cv02238
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv00983
Defendant:
J. JONES, JASON SERVIZZ, PRETORIUS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 1:2020cv00542
Defendant:
MONTE A. MCDANIEL, RAYMOND KINISON, APRIL BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DARRELL MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv03700
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
THE DIRECTOR OVER THE I.D.O.C, MCKEESON WHEELCHAIR COMPANY, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv01377
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, CHASITY, J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv01052
Defendant:
REBECCA J. TRIVETT, JASON SERVIZZI, MARK LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN E. LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTMORELAND et al v. PLAINFIELD I.D.O.C. MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00990
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, JASON SERVIZZI, PLAINFIELD I.D.O.C. MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
WEST MORELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2019cv00613
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
J. JONES, JASON SERVIZZI, PLAINFIELD MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv00275
Defendant:
A. SMITH, HAMPTON, RAYMOND KINISON and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY W. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADKINS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2019cv00133
Plaintiff:
SHELBY D. ADKINS
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, RAYMOND KINISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
