HILL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
| ADRIAN HILL |
| MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE, THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION |
| 1:2019cv02807 |
| July 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Doris L Pryor |
| James R Sweeney |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Vincent P. Circelli's #4 Motion to Appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff ADRIAN HILL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 7/24/2019. (SWM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney(s) Vincent P. Circelli to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5536485), filed by Plaintiff ADRIAN HILL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Circelli, Vincent) |
| Filing 3 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE, THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, filed by ADRIAN HILL. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5518085) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Circelli, Vincent) Modified on 7/10/2019 (double docket text) (DJH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
