Cases 1 - 10 of 838
Michael Rose, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8010
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROSE and TIMOTHY STRATTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and BIG TEN CONFERENCE
Jamie Richardson v. NCAA
as 24-8009
Petitioner:
JAMIE RICHARDSON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Eric Weston v. NCAA
as 24-8011
Petitioner:
ERIC WESTON
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Nicolette Langston, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8012
Petitioner:
NICOLETTE A. LANGSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of ZACK LANGSTON and DANAE YOUNG, as mother and next friend for D.L., a minor
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and MID-AMERICA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION
RIEDY v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RIEDY
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FRANKLIN v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
JANICE FRANKLIN
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BRANTMEIER v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Reese Brantmeier
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
J'Ta Freeman v. NCAA
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
J'TA FREEMAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Troyce Manassa v. NCAA
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
TROYCE MANASSA
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
