BARFIELD v. XPO LOGISTICS et al
DANA BARFIELD |
XPO LOGISTICS and ALLIED UNIVERSAL |
1:2019cv04579 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to Allied Universal Technology Services, LLC. (JRB) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE -Plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) to issue process to Allied Universal Technology Services, LLC in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint (Filing No. 1), applicable forms ((a)Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service and Summons and (b) Waiver of Service of Summons)), and this Order. SEE ORDER. Copies sent to Parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/26/2019. (JRB) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, DANA BARFIELD. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALLIED UNIVERSAL and XPO LOGISTICS, filed by DANA BARFIELD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #2 Letter from Allied Universal)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.