Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bristow-George v. Universal Protection Service, LLC
as 1:2026cv15076
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Bristow-George
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv08634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Universal Services of America, LP et al v. Davenport-Cortivo
as 4:2026cv01929
Defendant:
John Davenport-Cortivo
Plaintiff:
Universal Services of America, LP and Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal Security Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wainer v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 26-7437
Real Party In Interest:
Dr. DAVID CUTLER, CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
MARTIN WAINER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02545
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.