STROMINGER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
Plaintiff: RAYMOND STROMINGER
Defendant: STEPHEN R. HILL, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and LAFLOWERS
Case Number: 1:2020cv00437
Filed: February 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, filed by LAFLOWERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES.(Bitner, Douglass)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES identifying Corporate Parent THE BANTRY GROUP CORPORATION for WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES.. (Bitner, Douglass)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglass R. Bitner on behalf of Defendants LAFLOWERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES. (Bitner, Douglass)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by LAFLOWERS. LAFLOWERS waiver sent on 2/26/2020. (Bitner, Douglass)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES waiver sent on 2/26/2020. (Bitner, Douglass)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Documents for Service by IDOC - Ms. LaFlowers Healthcare Services Administrator at Pendleton re #7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #6 Entry, #1 Complaint. (DWH)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk TO: 1) Wexford Health Sources; 2) Stephen R. Hill; and 3) Health Services Administrator LaFlowers. (DWH)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The complaint has been screened and the Eighth Amendment claims set forth above shall proceed as submitted. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) (3) to issue process to defendant Wexford Health Services, Dr. Stephen R. Hill, OD, and Ms. LaFlowers in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt #1 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The Indiana Department of Correction employee shall be served electronically (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/21/2020. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DWH)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) (the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.). The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/21/2020. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT)
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAYMOND STROMINGER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Offender Trust System Transaction History Inquiry, #2 Envelope)(AKH)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STEPHEN R. HILL, LAFLOWERS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, filed by RAYMOND STROMINGER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STROMINGER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN R. HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES
Represented By: Douglass R. Bitner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAFLOWERS
Represented By: Douglass R. Bitner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAYMOND STROMINGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?