Cases 1 - 10 of 44
LAFLOWER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04968
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR LAFLOWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUND v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02996
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, STEPHEN R. HILL, P. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD LUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS-BEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv02871
Defendant:
REBECCA R. DAVIS, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.
Plaintiff:
TONY E. FIELDS-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Graham v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 20-2999
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHELLE LAFLOWER, NIKKI TAFOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER GRAHAM
Robert Peacher v. Paul Talbot, et al
as 20-2091
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ERNEST, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHAEL CONYERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT PEACHER
Robert Peacher v. Paul Talbot, et al
as 20-2060
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ERNEST, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHAEL CONYERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT PEACHER
STROMINGER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2020cv00437
Defendant:
STEPHEN R. HILL, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and LAFLOWERS
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv04570
Defendant:
MICHELLE LAFLOWER, DR. PAUL TALBOT, PENDLETON FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Talbot et al
as 3:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Michelle Laflower, Pendleton Facility, Zatecky and others
Plaintiff:
Demajio J Ellis
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
