ELLIS v. TALBOT et al
| DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS |
| PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ZATECKY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, PAUL TALBOT and GRIMES |
| 1:2020cv00667 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLOSED DISMISSED - In the complaint that initiated this action, the plaintiff included case number 1:19-cv-4570-JPH-DLP. Case number 1:19-cv-4570-JPH-DLP was initiated by the plaintiff on November 15, 2019. Because the complaint which initiated this action should have been docketed in the previously opened case, the clerk is directed to procedurally close this action and to docket the complaint at docket 1 in this action as an amended complaint in case number 1:19-cv-4570-JPH-DLP. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/28/2020.(MAC) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GRIMES, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PAUL TALBOT, ZATECKY, filed by DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
