Cases 1 - 10 of 789
KEPLINGER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2024cv00385
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., ROBERT EVANS, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS D KEPLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASSMORE` v. CARTER et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. PASSMORE
Defendant:
CARTER, ZATECKY, PHEGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
Bobby Cockerell, III v. Mike Conyers, et al
as 23-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY B. COCKERELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE CONYERS, Major, JERRY GILLEY, Capt, CURTIS BYNUM, Lieutenant, Lt and others
HARTSOCK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, ROBERT BUPREY, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
BARRY EDWARDS
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, CENTURION, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
