KEITH v. MASON et al
| REESE LEVI KEITH |
| BAGIENSKI, OFFICE OF WEXFORD, JANE DOE, MASON, MCKINNEY and JACKSON |
| 1:2020cv02740 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Documents to be Sent via Electronic Notice - re #2 Complaint, #10 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #9 Order Electronic Notice to IDOC. (MAC)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk. (MAC)
|
|
Filing 9
Order Screening Complaint, Dismissing Deficient Claims, and Directing Issuance and Service of Process. The Court has screened Mr. Keith's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A and directed that Eighth Amendment claims shall proceed against defendants Cpt. Mason, Lt. Jackson, Sgt. McKinney, and Lt. Bagienski. The complaint is dismissed against defendants "Office of Wexford" and "Jane Doe, Unknown Nurse" and the clerk is directed to terminate these two defendants from the docket. The clerk is directed to electronically serve the remaining four defendants as directed in Section IV. Mr. Keith shall have through January 7, 2021, to notify the Court of any overlooked claim and/or defendant in a motion to reconsider. The Court understands the four defendants to be employees of the IDOC. If any of the defendants are no longer IDOC employees or do not execute and file a waiver of service of summons, counsel for the defendants shall cause the IDOC to provide such defendants' last known address to the Court informally or by ex parte filing within thirty days of this Order. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/9/2020.(MAC)
|
|
Filing 8
RECEIPT #IP071739 for partial filing fee in the amount of $20.00, paid by C.S. on behalf of REESE LEVI KEITH. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 7
Order Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel - The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. The plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $20.00 to the clerk of the district court no later than December 4, 2020. The motion to appoint counsel, dkt. #4 , is denied without prejudice. The clerk is directed to send the plaintiff a form motion for assistance with recruiting counsel with his copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Form - Motion for Assistance With Recruiting Counsel) (JDH)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff REESE LEVI KEITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - Human Rights Defense Center Confidential Mail; Notice of Tort Claim mail). (AKH)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff REESE LEVI KEITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Prisoner Account; Offender Trust System Transaction History Inquiry). (AKH)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against BAGIENSKI, JANE DOE, JACKSON, MASON, MCKINNEY, OFFICE OF WEXFORD, filed by REESE LEVI KEITH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (AKH) Modified on 12/8/2020 (REO). (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/8/2020) (REO).
|
|
Filing 1
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by REESE LEVI KEITH located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by REESE LEVI KEITH to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
