ELLIS v. AMBER
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS |
AMBER |
1:2021cv02743 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court, having this day made its Order directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/8/2021. (MAC) |
Filing 7 ORDER Dismissing Case Without Prejudice and Directing Further Proceedings. This case is dismissed without prejudice for the foregoing reasons. Mr. Ellis' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as moot. Mr. Ellis is instructed to include any allegation related to a fainting episode at Pendleton in his amended complaint in Ellis v. Clark, 1:21-cv-02383-JMS-DML. If Mr. Ellis attempts to initiate any additional cases related to fainting at Pendleton that could have been included as allegations supporting his claims in Ellis v. Clark, the new complaint will be dismissed with prejudice as malicious under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Final judgment shall now issue. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/8/2021. (MAC) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:21-cv-2743-JMS-DML, on all future filings in this matter. (DJH) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson for all further proceedings. This case is related to 1:21-cv-2383-JMS-DML. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/4/2021. (TRG) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(LMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMBER, filed by DEMAJIO J. ELLIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Exhibit)(LMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ELLIS v. AMBER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DEMAJIO J. ELLIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AMBER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.