Cases 1 - 10 of 6,346
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Tessier et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marain Larayonda Rankins
Defendant:
Dr. Tessier, Dr. Stacy, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrari v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02871
Plaintiff:
Amber D. Ferrari
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harper v. Marinez et al
as 3:2024cv50143
Plaintiff:
Amber Harper
Defendant:
Judge Francis Marinez, Samantha Hagerman and Alesha Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hixson v Walmart, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Amber Hixson
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hixson v Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Amber Hixson
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Starks v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Amber Starks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
