STONE v. GASKIN et al
| ROBERT H. STONE |
| RICHARD GASKIN, SHELBY PUCKETT, DONNA BABBS, LYDIA STEPHENS, JEREMY JONES, PATRICIA PRETORIUS, STANLEY KNIGHT, FRANK VANHIL, PARKS, NEESE and I. RANDOLPH |
| 1:2021cv03047 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RECEIPT #ip077545 for partial filing fee in the amount of $30.88, paid by Robin Stone via credit card on behalf of ROBERT STONE. (DJH) |
Filing 8
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirty Dollars and Eighty-Eight Cents ($30.88). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The plaintiff shall have through February 8, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/10/2022. (JDC)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT H. STONE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Trust Account Information, #2 Envelope). (MAC) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ROBERT H. STONE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as presented, without prejudice. Accordingly, Mr. Stone shall have through January 17, 2022, to file an updated motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and attach a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on December 15, 2021. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Stone a blank form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis along with this copy of this Order (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/20/2021. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 blank form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis) (DWH)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US Mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, ROBERT H. STONE. (Attachments: #1 Offender Activity, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DONNA BABBS, RICHARD GASKIN, JEREMY JONES, STANLEY KNIGHT, NEESE, PARKS, PATRICIA PRETORIUS, SHELBY PUCKETT, I. RANDOLPH, LYDIA STEPHENS, and FRANK VANHIL, filed by ROBERT H. STONE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
