Cases 1 - 10 of 122
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Jones v. Safariland LLC et al
as 4:2023cv05154
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Safariland LLC and Devontea Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Merrick Garland, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18043
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN JEREMY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeremy Jones v. David Ceinski, Jr.
as 23-12178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID CEINSKI, JR.
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16582
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Brittany Green, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAUSE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GAUSE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. LAUREL L. HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
