SHARP v. BAKER et al
| JASON SHARP |
| ANGELA BAKER, KEVIN DEW, RICHARD WRIGHT, JUDY HINTON, ARMS, KATHY ALVEY, MICHAEL OSBURN, JAMES BASINGER and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. |
| 1:2022cv00238 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Change of Address for JASON SHARP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LBT)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Include Documents, filed by Plaintiff JASON SHARP. (Attachments: #1 Documents, #2 Envelope)(LBT)
|
|
Filing 10
RECEIPT #NA004593 for filing fee in the amount of $350, paid by Karen Sharp on behalf of Jason Sharp. (LBT)
|
|
Filing 9
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis sent to JASON SHARP. Return to Sender. Not deliverable as addressed. (AKH) **Dkt. #6 resent to Sharp at New Castle at Dtk. 8 ** Modified on 3/4/2022 (JRT).
|
|
Filing 8
Address updated for Jason Sharp from Branchville Correctional Facility to New Castle Correctional Facility based on the IDOC website. Dkts. #2 , #3 and #6 resent to Jason Sharp at New Castle Correctional Facility. (JRT)
|
|
Filing 7
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #3 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to JASON SHARP at Branchville CF, 21390 Old State Road 37, Branchville, IN 47514. Envelope marked return to sender; offender no longer at this facility. (LBT)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON #4 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #4 , is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Four Dollars and Twenty-Six Cents ($4.26). The plaintiff shall have through March 15, 2022, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. After the initial partial filing fee is received, a collection order will be issued to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's custodian, and the Court will screen the complaint. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/16/2022. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned as undeliverable. #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to JASON SHARP. Return to Sender. Offender is no longer at this facility. (AKH)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JASON SHARP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 2
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against KATHY ALVEY, ARMS, ANGELA BAKER, JAMES BASINGER, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR, KEVIN DEW, JUDY HINTON, MICHAEL OSBURN, RICHARD WRIGHT, filed by JASON SHARP. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(LMK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
