Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31096
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker Brady v. Texas Regional Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baker Brady
Defendant:
Texas Regional Hospital, Christie Shanafelt, Bruce J Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHARP v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
ANGELA BAKER, KEVIN DEW, RICHARD WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michelle Hammond-Beville v. Jeff Landis, et al
as 21-5498
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHELLE HAMMOND-BEVILLE
Defendant / Appellant:
RON CARTER, JASON SHARPE and KATHY MORANTE
Defendant:
JEFF LANDIS and CHEATHAM COUNTY, TN
Hammond-Beville v. Landis et al
as 3:2020cv00973
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hammond-Beville
Defendant:
Cheatham County, Tennessee, Kathy Morante, Jeff Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zurvita, Inc. et al v. Xu et al
as 8:2018cv02480
Defendant:
Stoian Annastasov, Qing Li, Xiaoyong Chi and others
Plaintiff:
Zurvita Holdings, Inc. and Zurvita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sharp v. Ballinger
as 1:2017cv00978
Petitioner:
Jason Sharp
Respondent:
Pamela Ballinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharpe v. Woods et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Sharpe
Defendant:
Spencer Woods, Tanner and Popik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lionel Robertson
Defendant:
Police Officers Michael Scoloveno, Police Officer Jason Sharp and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
