RHENWRICK v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
| RUBEN RHENWRICK |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. |
| 1:2022cv00775 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. identifying Corporate Parent UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. for UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC... (St. Pierre, Alyson) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (St. Pierre, Alyson) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alyson Marie St. Pierre on behalf of Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (St. Pierre, Alyson) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.. (JSR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Taylor-Price on behalf of Plaintiff RUBEN RHENWRICK. (Taylor-Price, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7067979) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Right to Sue Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Taylor-Price, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
