Cases 1 - 10 of 2,316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Chang v. United Parcel Service, Inc et al
as 8:2024cv02128
Defendant:
Wallace Parker, United Parcel Service, Inc, Antonio Donta Champ and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Goepfert v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 24-4467
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign public utility corporation doing business in Washington State
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. GOEPFERT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
THOMPSON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH THOMPSON
Defendant:
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P., NATHAN TURNER and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Albarado, et al. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al.
as 5:2024cv00756
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown, Erica Barrera and Patricia Albarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WILDE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC
as 2:2024cv07560
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
