DAVIS v. IDOC et al
| STEPHEN DAVIS |
| IDOC, MRS. QUICK, MRS. KNIGHT, MR. FOX, MRS. WIDNER and MRS. BELL |
| 1:2022cv01158 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CLOSED JUDGMENT/FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/13/2022.(AKH) |
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - Plaintiff Stephen Davis is a prisoner currently incarcerated at Pendleton Correctional Facility. He filed this lawsuit challenging actions taken in his bankruptcy proceedings and treatment of his inmate trust account. In the Order of June 13, 2022, the Court screened Mr. Davis's complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915A and dismissed it for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Dkt. #9 ). Mr. Davis was directed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Id. He was also directed to supplement his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by submitting a copy of the transactions associated with his inmate trust account for the 6-month period preceding this the filing of this lawsuit. (Dkt. #10 ). Mr. Davis has responded by filing a response, a motion for relief, and a motion to object. Accordingly, the motion for relief, dkt. #13 , and motion to object, dkt. #14 , are each DENIED. Mr. Davis has failed to state a claim for relief as explained in the Order of June 13, 2022, and this case is now dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. (See Order). Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/13/2022. (AKH)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Object, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Relief, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Court Order Dkt. #9 , filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through July 12, 2022, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff Stephen Davis is a prisoner currently incarcerated at Pendleton Correctional Facility. He filed this civil action apparently challenging actions taken in his bankruptcy proceedings and treatment of his inmate trust account. Because the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. 1915A(c), this Court has an obligation under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a) to screen his complaint before service on the defendants. The plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for each of the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through July 8, 2022, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. Because Mr. Davis has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, his motion for discovery, dkt. #3 , motion for statement, dkt. #4 , motion to retain records, dkt. #5 , and motion to retain through government agents, dkt. #6 , are each DENIED. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/13/2022.
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Retain Through Government Agents or Attorney Rough Notes or Writing, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Retain Records for Investigators, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 4 MOTION For Statement of Defendant Mrs. Quick, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Discovery, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff STEPHEN DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JSR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IDOC, MR. FOX, MRS. BELL, MRS. KNIGHT, MRS. QUICK, MRS. WIDNER, filed by STEPHEN DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit Grievance Procedure, #3 Envelope)(JSR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
