STEPHENS v. ELDRIDGE
JAMES STEPHENS |
MYLA ELDRIDGE |
1:2022cv01473 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant MYLA ELDRIDGE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lowrey, John) |
Filing 10 Dkt. #5 resent to James Stephens at address on docket, Putnamville Correctional Facility, per IDOC website. (JRT) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Return to sender, returned for postage removal label before remailing sort in manual only no automation #5 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction sent to JAMES STEPHENS. (JDC) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against MYLA ELDRIDGE, filed by JAMES STEPHENS.(AKH) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by JAMES STEPHENS located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by JAMES STEPHENS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) |
Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant MYLA ELDRIDGE. (Lowrey, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John P. Lowrey on behalf of Defendant MYLA ELDRIDGE. (Lowrey, John) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of No Pending Motions in State Court, filed by Defendant MYLA ELDRIDGE (Lowrey, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D02-2206-MI-022795, filed by MYLA ELDRIDGE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7202331) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record Chronological Case Summary, Appearance, Consent to receipt of E-filing, Affidavit, Certificate of offender Trust Account, Complaint, Summons, Order to Transfer Venue, Certificate of Transfer, Appearance., #3 State Court Record Plaintiff's Complaint)(Lowrey, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: STEPHENS v. ELDRIDGE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JAMES STEPHENS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MYLA ELDRIDGE | |
Represented By: | John P. Lowrey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.