PARTLOW v. KOENIG et al
| EDWARD M. PARTLOW |
| ALEXHANDER KOENIG, BRUMFIEL, LUNSFORD, RUIZ, DENNIS REAGLE, THOMAS and CHRISTINA CONYERS |
| 1:2023cv00599 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Submission of Documents, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (JRB) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($9.44). The plaintiff shall have through June 14, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/17/23. (JRB)
|
| Filing 12 Renewed MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Submission of Trust Account, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (AAS) |
| Filing 11 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket Sheet, filed by Edward Partlow. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet) (CKM) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER - denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as presented because the attached inmate trust account statement, dkt. 2-1, is incomplete and unsigned. See 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a)(2). Accordingly, on or before May 12, 2023, Plaintiff must file a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action on April 5, 2023. Id. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/17/2023. (CKM)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 8 Submission of Previously Filed Documents, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (CKM) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by EDWARD M. PARTLOW located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by EDWARD M. PARTLOW to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CKM) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF TORT CLAIM, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW (DRB) |
| Filing 3 Submission of Unsigned ES Consent Form, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (DRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRUMFIEL, CHRISTINA CONYERS, ALEXHANDER KOENIG, LUNSFORD, DENNIS REAGLE, RUIZ, THOMAS, filed by EDWARD M. PARTLOW. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
