WARNER v. LEE et al
BRADLEY WARNER |
MIKE LEE, JACOB BEASLEY, NICOLAS GULDE and JOE HEATH |
1:2023cv01824 |
October 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Kellie M Barr |
James R Sweeney |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JACOB BEASLEY, NICOLAS GULDE, JOE HEATH, MIKE LEE, filed by BRADLEY WARNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed by Plaintiff BRADLEY WARNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRADLEY WARNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail (JRB) Modified on 10/12/2023 (JRB). |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRADLEY WARNER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JACOB BEASLEY, NICOLAS GULDE, JOE HEATH, MIKE LEE, filed by BRADLEY WARNER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) Modified on 10/11/2023 - fixed name spelling (CCG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.