Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Grier v. Jacob Beasley et al
as 1:2025cv00074
Petitioner:
Lamaris Antonion Grier
Respondent:
Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolden v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, Lupo, Dassious and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bernard Bolden, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Ward et al
as 6:2024cv00069
Defendant:
Mrs. Tatum, Timothy C. Ward, Mrs. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN RALPH SHROPSHIRE, WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodrekus Watson v. Jacob Beasley, et al
as 24-13065
Defendant:
WELLPATH, JACOB BEASLEY and STEPHENSON
Plaintiff:
RODREKUS WATSON
CLEMENTS v. BEASLEY
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD CLEMENTS, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Wilson et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Mr. Wilson, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Lieutenant Haley Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Reeves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00038
Defendant:
Sgt. Wilson and Warden Jacob Beasley
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
