MONSIVAIS v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
Plaintiff: DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV
Defendant: ARAMARK CORP., CECIL, FELIX, LEWIS, PATTON, BRIDGEMAN, MASSENBERG, SCARBROUGH and WRIGLEY
Case Number: 1:2025cv02321
Filed: November 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2026 Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ARAMARK CORP., BRIDGEMAN, CECIL, FELIX, LEWIS, MASSENBERG, PATTON, SCARBROUGH, WRIGLEY, filed by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (BAA)
May 1, 2026 Filing 19 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon (1) Aramark; (2) Mr. Cecil; (3), Ms. Felix; (4) Ms. Lewis; (5) Ms. Patton; (6) Ms. Bridgeman; (7) Mr. Massenberg; (8) Officer Scarbrough; and (9) Assistant Warden Wrigley. (BAA)
May 1, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER SCREENING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff David Monsivais' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Dkt. #16 ), and Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #17 ). The clerk is DIRECTED to re-docket the Amended Complaint, (Dkt. [16-1]), as the Amended Complaint. Having screened the Amended Complaint, the claims listed in the Discussion shall proceed and Mr. Monsivais shall have through May 29, 2026, in which to file a motion to reconsider the screening order. The clerk is DIRECTED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint filed on March 31, 2026, dkt. [16-1], applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/1/2026. (See Order.) Distribution made pursuant to distribution list. (BAA)
April 20, 2026 Filing 17 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AAS)
March 31, 2026 Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)(SAM)
March 9, 2026 Filing 15 RECEIPT #19773 for Partial filing fee fee in the amount of $15.20, paid by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS IV. (JHS)
March 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER - Plaintiff's two motions asking the Court to confirm that it received his initial partial filing fee of $26.03, dkts. #9 and #12 , are granted. The Court received that payment on December 23, 2025. Dkt. 10 . The clerk is directed to enclose a public docket sheet with Plaintiff's copy of this Order. The docket sheet includes receipts for all payments received in this case. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet) (JRB)
February 9, 2026 Filing 13 RECEIPT #19329 for Partial filing fee fee in the amount of $16.80, paid by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS IV. (JHS)
January 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER PAYMENT - Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV, 250273, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court at 46 East Ohio Street, Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, consistent with paragraph 2 of this Entry. The appropriate cause number, 1:25-CV-02321-TWP-TAB, should be placed on each payment sent to the Clerk. Checks must be issued for a single plaintiff and include the case number or numbers to which the payment should be applied. (See Order.) Copies Distributed Per Distribution List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 01/20/2026. (AJG)
January 16, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION for Payment Confirmation, filed by Plaintiff DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SAM)
January 9, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION for Court Assistance re Payment Confirmation, filed by Plaintiff DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SAM) Modified on 1/12/2026 to add text (SAM).
December 23, 2025 Filing 10 RECEIPT #18634 for partial filing fee in the amount of $26.03, paid by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS IV. (DJH)
December 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $26.03. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. Signed by District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/4/2025. (See Order.) Distribution made pursuant to Distribution list. (BAA)
December 1, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Trust Account Statement, filed by Plaintiff DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (SAM)
November 24, 2025 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (SAM)
November 19, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 12/19/2025 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to Plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Form Motion IFP) (MRI)
November 13, 2025 Filing 4 Notice Regarding Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (DJH)
November 13, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (DJH)
November 13, 2025 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
November 6, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK CORP., BRIDGEMAN, CECIL, FELIX, LEWIS, MASSENBERG, PATTON, SCARBROUGH, WRIGLEY, filed by DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONSIVAIS v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CECIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FELIX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIDGEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MASSENBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCARBROUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WRIGLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?