Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MONSIVAIS v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 1:2025cv02321
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARMANDO MONSIVAIS, IV
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., CECIL, FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bannon et al
as 3:2025cv05706
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams and James A Washburn
Defendant:
Bannon, Chun, Leyster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMaster et al v. Wayne, County of
as 2:2025cv11218
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline McMaster, Betty Dobbins, Marcus Jamison and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Taylor, City of, Lincoln Park, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MASSENBERG-MEDINA v. HICKS et al
as 2:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
CHANITA MASSENBERG-MEDINA
Cross Claimant:
WALTER HICKS and A&S SERVICES GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, CELADON TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. and ABC CORPORATIONS 2-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Massenberg v. Yellen
as 4:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
Robin L Massenberg
Defendant:
Janet L Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Sgt. Massenberg
as 21-7015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. MASSENBERG, CHRISTOPHER ROLFE, Unit Manger, SGT. PEARSON and others
Massenberg v. Division 6 Medical Staff et al
as 1:2020cv03580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Massenberg
Defendant:
Division 6 Medical Staff, McColough, Pharmacist who tendered expired Medication and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massenberg v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01712
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Keith Donnell Massenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Casares v. Linthicum et al
as 6:2017cv00701
Plaintiff:
Vincent Casares
Defendant:
Lannette Linthicum, Unknown Richardson, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iaan Lee v. Seargent Massenberg
as 13-7048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IAAN MICHAEL LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. MASSENBERG, DOCTOR ABBASI and SGT. MCINTYRE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
