BISHOP v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
JASON BISHOP |
RAJOLI, THERESA STRAW, ROSE VAISVILAS, BRYANT BLOSS and CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES |
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
2:2012cv00281 |
September 24, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
William G. Hussmann |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER - In light of Mr. Bishop's failure to prosecute this action, the Court finds it appropriate to DISMISS Mr. Bishop's action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Any pending deadlines are VACATED and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/2/2013.(RSF) |
Filing 56 ORDER - The Court GRANTS the State Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, [dkt. 32 ], and the DOC and Ms. Vaisvilas are DISMISSED from this action. The State Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT because no claims remain pending against those defendants. [Dkt. 35 .] Partial final judgment will not issue at this time. ***SEE ORDER*** Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/16/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) |
Filing 10 ORDER denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Copy mailed to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/5/2012. (NS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.