Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Terrance Swann v. Samuel Byrd, et al
as 25-3358
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D. SWANN
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, M.D., NAVEEN RAJOLI, M.D., VICTORIA CRAWFORD, Nurse Practioner and others
Kerel Seabrooks v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 25-2799
Plaintiff:
KEREL L. SEABROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, KAYLA MCDONALD, MATTHEW KEYES and others
BUFORD v. BYRD et al
as 2:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON BUFORD
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, NAVEEN RAJOLI, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinley Kelly v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, SAMUEL BYRD, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
DUNN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLS v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
STANLEY WILLS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Drucker, II v. Barbara Riggs, et al
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA RIGGS, NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON and others
Jasper Frazier v. Naveen Rajoli, et al
as 22-3007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, Doctor, BARBARA RIGGS, Nurse and KIMBERLY A. HOBSON
SEABROOKS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, et al
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
KEREL L. SEABROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, CENTURION OF INDIANA, LLC, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RAJOLI et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
LESLIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD, AMY WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
