NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

Plaintiff:	ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant:	THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Case Number:	2:2013cv00209
Filed:	June 10, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Larry J. McKinney
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 14, 2013	Filing 18 AMENDED ENTRY Discussing Request to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Because the plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith, and because he is ineligible to proceed in that fashion because of the barrier created by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 16] is denied. Further, the plaintiff is reminded that "unpaid docket fees incurred by litigants subject to Section 1915(g) lead straight to an order forb idding further litigation." Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999). "An effort to bamboozle the court by seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis after a federal judge has held that '1915(g) applies to a particular litigant will lead to immediate termination of the suit." Sloan, 181 F.3d at 859. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 8/14/2013. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.(NMT)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 14, 2013

Filing 18 AMENDED ENTRY Discussing Request to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Because the plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith, and because he is ineligible to proceed in that fashion because of the barrier created by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 16] is denied. Further, the plaintiff is reminded that "unpaid docket fees incurred by litigants subject to Section 1915(g) lead straight to an order forb idding further litigation." Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999). "An effort to bamboozle the court by seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis after a federal judge has held that '1915(g) applies to a particular litigant will lead to immediate termination of the suit." Sloan, 181 F.3d at 859. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 8/14/2013. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.(NMT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?