Cases 1 - 10 of 6,591
Corliss v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv02766
Plaintiff:
George F. Corliss
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Waters v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Richard Ray Waters
Defendant:
United States of America a governmental entity doing business as United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
King v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv03488
Plaintiff:
Arlandra King
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mridul Bhrel and Louis Dejoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
as 1:2024mc00052
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ronna Banks v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv03415
Plaintiff:
Ronna Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
New 35th & Indiana Currency Exchange, Inc, v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv03342
Plaintiff:
New 35th & Indiana Currency Exchange, Inc,
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrument
Souza Lima Viana v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Raphael Souza Lima Viana
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Isi E. Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
