BUSTILLO v. NORTH et al
FERNANDO BUSTILLO |
DECKER, D. HANNA and H. NORTH |
2:2013cv00225 |
June 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 ENTRY Granting Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - 76 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry of 8/11/2014 shall now issue. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/10/2015 (copy mailed to plaintiff). (LBT) |
Filing 73 ORDER denying 67 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The plaintiff has now moved to file an amended complaint to add several new defendants and claims. Bustillo's proposed amended complaint is futile and his motion to amend [dkt 67] must therefore be denied. **SEE ORDER** Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/24/2014. (AH) |
Filing 54 ENTRY - Mr. Bustillo's 50 motion for protective order is denied. The defendants' 47 motion requesting the sanction of dismissal is granted in part consistent with the following: The Pavey hearing will be rescheduled, but Mr. Bustillo will be permitted only to cross-examine the defendants' witnesses and present argument to support his claims. He will not be permitted to present evidence or testimony at the hearing. Mr. Bustillo is further ordered to pay the defendants' ; reasonable expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in attempting to conduct the deposition.The defendants shall have through July 15, 2014, in which to provide an accounting of those fees. The Pavey hearing will be rescheduled in a separate order. **SEE ENTRY** Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/2/2014. (ADH) |
Filing 41 Entry - Denying Motions for Summary Judgment and and Directing Further Proceedings. The motions for summary judgment 21 and 33 are each denied. Because this case involves similar disputes of fact with respect to the question of whether Mr. Bustillo exhausted his available administrative remedies as the factual disputes identified in Case Nos. 2:13-cv-120-JMS-WGH and 2:13-cv-192-JMS-WGH, the required Pavey hearing in this case will be joined with the Pavey hearing already set in those cases for June 26, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/25/2014.(RSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.