Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nigel Parms v. Allegheny County Facility, et al
as 26-2341
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY FACILITY, ZOLLER, DAVID, Inmate Account Property and others
Cardoso v. Allen et al
as 3:2026cv01795
Plaintiff:
Enimia Cardoso
Defendant:
Roderick Dewayne Allen and Decker Truck Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lim v. Arion et al
as 3:2026cv00722
Plaintiff:
Duck Lim
Defendant:
Warren Lee Vern Arion and Decker Truck Line Inc., Misnamed Decker Leasing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fred Perez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 26-2062
Plaintiff:
FRED F. PEREZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., originally named as HOME DEPOT CORPORATION, EDWARD TED DECKER and JOHN DOE, #1 & #2, in their individual and official capacities
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv05683
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv05631
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Collins v. Tomasi et al
as 5:2026cv03131
Plaintiff:
Justin Jade Collins
Defendant:
Billy Tomasi, Jason Vanbecelaere, Reina Probert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCaw v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00967
Plaintiff:
Carl David McCaw
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
