RASHID MUHAMMAD v. RUPSKA et al
| ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD |
| HEATHER ATTERBURY, T. BAILEY, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BLILA, LYNN FORTUNE, CAROL SUE GEHRKE, LCDR KIMBERLY KLINK, ASHLEY MATCHETT, KAYLA MILLER, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE PARKER, A. RUPSKA, KAREN SCULLY, TIMOTHY TABOR and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2015cv00228 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ENTRY Discussing Plaintiff's and Federal Defendants' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. ORDER denying Plaintiff's 111 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Federal Defendants 116 Motion for Summary Judgment. This Entry resolves all claims against all remaining parties. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Order). Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2018. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
92
Entry Denying Judgment as a Matter of Law on Exhaustion Defense - Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 65 is DENIED and the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is REJECTED. The claims against Heather Atterbury and Kayla Miller shall proceed to the merits (SEE ENTRY). Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
88
Entry Discussing United States' Motion for Summary Judgment - The United States' Motion for Summary Judgment, dkt. 60 , is granted. The clerk is directed to terminate the United States as a defendant on the docket. This Entry does not resolve all claims against all parties. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry (SEE ENTRY). Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/26/2017. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
