Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Scott v. Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2026cv01689
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Scott
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, James Cox, Edward Bailey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Nurse et al
as 1:2026cv11317
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Phillips
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, C/O Cox and C/O Bailey
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2026cv01365
Plaintiff:
David Bailey
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tugman v. Kotek et al
as 2:2026cv01920
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Scott Tugman
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Nicole Townsend, Greta Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Raynor v. Mack Bailey
as 26-6966
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERMAN RAYNOR, Sr.
Defendant:
MACK A. BAILEY, Jr., Warden of Lunenburg C.C., JOSEPH WALTERS, Director of VA D.O.C., COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEYS, VA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Demetrius BaileyIn re: Demetrius Bailey
as 26-3233
Petitioner:
In re: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Deon Turner v. William Bailey
as 26-6961
Petitioner:
DEON ARNELL TURNER
Respondent:
WILLIAM BAILEY and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zeigler v. Willoughby et al
as 5:2026cv01653
Plaintiff:
Rachel Leeann Zeigler
Defendant:
Reed M. Willoughby, A. Cervantez, S. Benefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
