ROSALES v. CORIZON, INC. et al
| OSCAR ROSALES |
| MANDIP KAUR BARTELS, CORIZON, INC., KIM HOBSON, NEIL JOHN MARTIN, MCHAEL MITCHEFF, MARY RANKIN, R. ROBINSON, M. RODRIGUEZ and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2016cv00080 |
| March 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for [178, 179, 180, and 182] Defendants are directed to comply with any remaining terms of the parties' settlement agreement, and thereafter notify the Court of such compliance, at which time this matter will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/4/2018.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
104
Entry Granting Motion to Set Aside Default and Denying Motion for Default Judgment - For the foregoing reasons, Dr. Patel's motion to set aside default, dkt. 96 , is granted and Rosales's motion for default judgment, dkt. 99 , is denied (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/7/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
43
Entry - Denying 22 Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/29/2016. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
30
Entry Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Oscar Rosales, an inmate at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants have failed to p roperly treat his knee, back, and neck pain and his bladder issues. He has filed an Amended Complaint in which he alleges violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the Americans with Disabilities Act a nd the Rehabilitation Act. Based on the filing of the Amended Complaint, the motion to dismiss 17 is denied as moot. The claims alleged in the Amended Complaint shall proceed as directed in this Entry. Rosales's claims for deliberate indif ference to his serious medical needs shall proceed against Dr. Neil Martin, Dr. Pulkit J. Patel, Dr. Mitcheff, and Corizon. His claim under the Rehabilitation Act shall proceed against the Commissioner of the IDOC in his official capacity. All oth er defendants shall be terminated. Corizon and Dr. Martin have already appeared in this action. In addition, Corizon and Dr. Martin filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint before the screening of the Amended Complaint was complete. Accordingly, the Answer to the Amended Complaint 29 is stricken as premature. Corizon and Dr. Martin shall have twenty-one days from the date of this Entry to Answer the Amended Complaint as screened. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) t o issue process to defendants Dr. Pulkit Patel, Dr. Mitcheff, and the Commission of the IDOC in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Entry.) Copies to parties pursuant to the distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/12/2016.(BRR)
|
|
Filing
11
ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Rosales's claims for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs shall proceed against Dr. Neil Martin and Corizon. All other defendants shall be terminated. The clerk is de signated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Neil Martin and Corizon in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/25/2016. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (GSO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
