BRYANT v. FCI TERRE HAUTE et al
||FCI TERRE HAUTE, GRANGER, B GREMORE, REBEL and UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA
||May 24, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Terre Haute Office
||Mark J. Dinsmore
||William T. Lawrence
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 7, 2017
CLOSED JUDGMENT - Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Courtnow enters FINAL JUDGMENT. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall take nothing by his complaint and this action is terminated. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/7/2017. (Copy mailed to Pltf via Us Mail.)(REO) Modified on 12/7/2017 (REO).
|April 11, 2017
Entry Discussing Second Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Andrew Bryant, a former inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana, brings this action pursuant to Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C . ' 2671, et seq. ("FTCA"), and the theory recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The plaintiff alleges that he was attacked in the "chow hall" by another inmat e, that an incident report was written, but later dismissed. He has filed an amended complaint, which is now subject to screening. For the reasons discussed above, all claims in the amended complaint other than the claim that that the negligence o f staff at the FCI Terre Haute caused Bryant to be injured in an attack by another inmate are not viable. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint is rejected as futile and this case shall continue to proceed as directed in the Entries of June 17, 2016, and December 20, 2016. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/11/2017.(RSF)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?