DOUGLAS v. LEMMON et al
| MONWELL DOUGLAS |
| HEATHER BLASINGANE, K. GILMORE, HEAD NURSING AID CORIZON MEDICAL, KIM HOBSON, BRUCE LEMMON, TERESA LITTLEJOHN, MICHAEL OSBORN, FAITH REEVES and BOBBI RIGGS |
| CASEWORKER MANAGER |
| UNIT TEAM MANAGER |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2016cv00368 |
| September 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
Entry Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgmentand Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Defendant Faith Reeves is entitled to summary judgment on Mr. Douglas' claim of retaliation. Accordingly, her motion for summary judgment, dkt . 99 , is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the screening Entry of February 27, 2017, dkt. 38 , dismissing other claims, shall now issue (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/2/2018. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
20
ENTRY: Accordingly, the plaintiff's request for a TRO is denied. The plaintiff alleges that defendants Lemmon, Brown, Gilmore, and Osborn have denied plaintiff's requests for assistance in securing a transfer to another prison. The cl aims against these defendants are dismissed. The claim asserted against Ms. Littlejohn is dismissed. The plaintiff alleges that Casework Manager Reeves has denied him "entitlements.", such claim is dismissed. Claims against Ms. Bla singane are dismissed. The plaintiff alleges that Nurse Riggs submitted a false conduct report when she charged him with Threatening, any constitutional claim based on these allegations must be dismissed. Any claim asserted against Nurse Hobson in this action is dismissed. For the above reasons, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as a matter of law and is therefore dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The plaintiff shall have through January 4, 2017, in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/2/2016.(DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
