HAMLET v. COMMISSIONER et al
KEVIN D. HAMLET |
BROWN, C. BURKETT, COMMISSIONER, K. DAVIDSON, M. EASTON, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, JOHN LAYTON, MARION CO. CLERK OF THE COURT RM. 24, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CLASSIFICATION DEPT., RANDY SHORT, SUPERINTENDENT and UNKNOWN |
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only) |
2:2017cv00067 |
February 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 169 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 166 . It is now ordered that the Defendants' request for fees and costs related to the motion to enforce, dkt 154 is deemed WITHDRAWN. The motion to enforce, dkt 154 , is GRANTED to the extent that the Court finds that the oral settlement agreemen t reached by the parties on May 1, 2019, is binding upon the parties. Defendants are ORDERED to pay Plaintiff the sum of $2,400.00 within fourteen (14) days of the dismissal of the lawsuit. Plaintiff's motion for recruited counsel to return evidence and file, dkt 167 , is denied. This matter is dismissed with prejudice and final judgment shall now issue. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/6/2019. (DMW) |
Filing 14 Entry Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff is a prisoner currently incarcerated at Putnamville Correctional Industrial Facility ("Putnamville"). Because the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), this Court has an obligation under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) to screen his amended complaint [dkt. 12 ] before service on the defendants. For the reasons explained below, certain claims will proceed while othe r claims must be dismissed. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Drew Adams, John Sosler, Kayla Davidson, and Michael Easton in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the a mended complaint filed on March 1, 2017 (docket 12 ), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. (See Entry.) Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list via US Mail.Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/19/2017.(RSF) |
Filing 6 Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings: The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 3 ] is granted. The plaintiff shall have through March 13, 2017, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue or to file an amended complaint which corrects the deficiencies noted above (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/13/2017. (DW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.